CPB::I. ¿Qué puede ser hoy un marxismo ortodoxo::2. Marx, los marxistas, nosotros::f. ¿Se puede “rescatar” algo de los clásicos del marxismo::01/en

From Carlos Pérez Soto
Jump to: navigation, search

To be more precise: what does giving up the heritage of classical Marxism and inventing a Marxism of new type, from Marx, mean? What is meant by "classical Marxism"? Why only to save Marx? Is there nothing in classical Marxism to take takes advantage from? Why "abandon" and not, for example, recreate? Couldn't we take advantage of contributions from Lukacs, Bloch, Gramsci? Why simply putting all Marxists of the past century in one bag? Isn't there nothing in the Marxism of the past 30 years, say, which isn't a simple ad hoc exercise, which may be considered creative? Why not consider that this proposal itself, the one of Pérez, is but another series of ad hoc hypothesis?